To recap, my program essentially generated a pair of triangles in the same $b-a$ class
and generated a third triangle
If the full structure exists, one would expect my program to return at least two results for one of the classes. This is because for a certain class, my program would give the three red triangles once and the three green triangle once.
Last week, I also examined an excel spreadsheet of the $b-a$ classes of primitive Pythagorean triples. However, I also examined the $b+a$ classes as well
Each red value indicates a duplicate value. This is important because in our diagram, we have three triangles that belong to the same $a+b$ class.
By looking at this spreadsheet some patterns become immediately clear: duplicate values occur at regular intervals in lines. If we pick a line through the origin with slope $-\frac{r}{s}$, and pick a point it hits, we should be able to draw a line of slope $\frac{r-s}{r+s}$ through this point it hits and find duplicate values. For example, if we pick slope $3$, the points we hit are highlighted in blue. If we then draw lines of slope $\frac{3-1}{3+1}=\frac24=\frac12$, we hit duplicate values.
While this is very interesting, it is not what I am focusing on most.
If we return to the structure of Pythagorean triangles
we notice that the white lines showing the class of each triangle converge to four points at the bottom. This means that from these four numbers, we can generate this whole structure. First let's name these points
We need each triangle's hypotenuse to be an integer, so we need $\sqrt{height^2+length^2}=\sqrt{\left(\frac{y-x}{2}\right)^2+\left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)^2}=\sqrt{\frac{x^2+y^2}{2}}$ to be an integer where $x$ and $y$ are any pair of numbers from $a,b,c$, or $d$. The six possible pairs each correspond to a triangle.
How would we start finding such numbers?
If we start out with
$a_1^2+b^2=2j^2$
$a_2^2+c^2=2k^2$
$a_3^2+d^2=2l^2$
we can then say
$\left(a_2a_1a_3\right)^2+\left(ca_1a_3\right)^2=2\left(ka_1a_3\right)^2$
$\left(a_3a_1a_2\right)^2+\left(da_1a_2\right)^2=2\left(la_1a_2\right)^2$
So we now have a number that satisfies our equation three ways
Now we need the pairs of these other three numbers to satisfy the equations
$\left(ba_2a_3\right)^2+\left(ca_1a_3\right)^2=2p^2$
$\left(ba_2a_3\right)^2+\left(da_1a_2\right)^2=2q^2$
$\left(da_1a_2\right)^2+\left(ca_1a_3\right)^2=2r^2$
You might notice that we can simplify these equations to
$\left(ba_2\right)^2+\left(ca_1\right)^2=2p'^2$
$\left(ba_3\right)^2+\left(da_1\right)^2=2q'^2$
$\left(da_2\right)^2+\left(ca_3\right)^2=2r'^2$
If we look at the first equation and our starting equations, we see
$a_1^2+b^2=2j^2$
$a_2^2+c^2=2k^2$
$\left(ba_2\right)^2+\left(ca_1\right)^2=2p'^2$
The first two equations describe Pythagorean triples and the third equation describes a Pythagorean triple made of the previous two Pythagorean triples. So it is possible to "multiply" two Pythagorean triples together?
If we look back to
then we can see that
$23^2+289^2=2*205^2$
$527^2+289^2=2*425^2$
can be multiplied to get
$\left(289*23\right)^2+\left(289*527\right)^2=\left(373*289\right)^2$
this week's calculator will be up shortly
I feel this post was more of a beginning than an ending, but ultimately that's what research should be. Best of luck on the final presentation!
ReplyDeleteHi Vijay! It seems like this problem is all-encompassing, to say the least. I found it interesting, however, that with all the new paths you have taken, you are coming to one of your original, base facts. Ultimately, did you prove that a magic square of squares exists or not? I look forward to your upcoming final presentation!
ReplyDeleteHI Vijay! It seems like your work with this problem has tested many different areas of mathematics. I found your approaches to the problem extremely interesting and thoughtful. In the end, were you able to prove the existence of magic squares? I am looking forward to next week!
ReplyDeleteHi Vijay! I found this problem especially interesting. It was very cool to see you progress through such a difficult problem. So, were you able to find out if magic squares exist? I'm looking forward to reading your final post next week. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteHi Vijay,
ReplyDeleteYour display of your thought process and analytical problem skills is amazing! Keep up the good work!
Sincerely,
Bhavik Rajaboina
Hi Vijay! I found your work on this problem very interesting, and I think that your research could, given enough time, lead you to the answer to this problem! Looking forward to your final post next week.
ReplyDelete